365体育网站

Accountability and Ethics

  • Kristin Reichborn-KjennerudEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2465-2

Accountability is a concept that no one can be against. It conveys an image of transparency and trustworthiness. It is increasingly used in political discourse and policy documents. The concept has many meanings and is partly overlapping with other concepts such as “responsibility.”

365体育网站This chapter will first elaborate on why accountability is important. Subsequently different meanings of the concept will be presented. Lastly how the different meanings of accountability relate to the quality of government will be discussed.

Why “Accountability” Is an Important Concept

People’s natural inclination is to favor their own kind, whether it be family, friends, business associates, or other individuals or organizations that they have a close relation to. Modern democratic rule, on the contrary, has ethical universalism as an ideal. In this context it is necessary to move away from particularism and favoritism (Mungiu-Pippidi 2013). Many argue that accountability and control are a prerequisite...

Keywords

Civil Servant Formal System Public Administration Public Organization Supervisory Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bovens M (2005) Public accountability. In Ferlie E. (eds), The Oxford handbook of public administration (pp. 422–445). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
  2. Christensen T, Lægreid P (2011) The Ashgate research companion to new public management. In P Lægreid & T Christensen (eds), (pp. XVI, 505 s.). Farnham: Ashgate
  3. Fukuyama F (2014) Political order and political decay. Profile books Ltd., London
  4. Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69(1):3–19
  5. Mulgan R (2000) ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm 78(3):555–573
  6. Mungiu-Pippidi A (2006) Corruption: diagnosis and treatment. J Democr 17(3):86–99
  7. Mungiu-Pippidi A (2013) Controlling corruption through collective action. J Democr 24(1):101–115
  8. Power M (1997) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  9. Reichborn- Kjennerud K (2013) Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the Auditor General in Norway. Public Adm 91(3):680–695
  10. Reichborn-Kjennerud K, Johnsen Å (2015) Performance audits and supreme audit institutions’ impact on public administration. The case of the Office of the Auditor General in Norway. Adm Soc. doi:10.1177/0095399715623315
  11. Rothstein B, Teorell J (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2):165–190
  12. Rothstein B (2011) The quality of government: corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public ManagementThe Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway