- 628 Downloads
Introduction: What Is Abusive Leadership?
There exists a litany of disparate constructs for describing abusive leadership, such as abusive supervision, petty tyranny, supervisor aggression, supervisor incivility, supervisor undermining, workplace bullying, and negative mentoring experience. Although these terminologies differ in describing abusive leadership, they all overlap to some degree. One dominant construct in the literature that has a unifying theoretical framework is abusive supervision, which is defined as subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which their supervisors engage in the prolonged display of nonphysical hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors––such as public ridiculing and belittling, taking credit for subordinates’ work, giving subordinates the silent treatment, and invading subordinates’ privacy (Tepper 2000).
KeywordsAbusive Supervision Social Exchange Theory Workplace Bully Moral Anger Abusive Leadership
- Aquino K, Thau S (2009) Workplace victimization: aggression from the target’s perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 60:717–741
- Bandura A (1973) Aggression: a social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
- Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag 31(6):874–900
- Liang LH, Lian H, Brown D, Hanig S, Ferris DL, Keeping LM (2016) Why are abusive supervisors abusive? A dual-system self-control model. Acad Manag J 59:1–22
- Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Marinova SV (2012) A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Pers Psychol 65(2):325–357
- Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78
- Tepper BJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manage J 43(2):178–190
- Tepper BJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Manag 33(3):261–289
- Thau S, Mitchell MS (2010) Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. J Appl Psychol 95(6):1009–1031