365体育网站

Encyclopedia of Social Insects

Living Edition
| Editors: Christopher K. Starr

Aging

  • Jürgen HeinzeEmail author
  • Judith Korb
  • Boris Kramer
Living reference work entry
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_3-1
  • 81 Downloads

Synonyms

What Is Aging?

Aging or senescence generally refers to an age-dependent decline in physiological function, leading to an increase in age-specific mortality or a decline in fertility. Since it is usually complicated to identify the health state of an individual, aging is often defined demographically as increasing age-specific mortality, estimated from entire cohorts or populations. Although details of this ubiquitous phenomenon are mostly studied in well-established laboratory model organisms, such as Drosophila and house mice, social insects have recently emerged as model organisms to study the evolution of aging.

Why Is Aging Special in Social Insects?

Perennial social insects are of interest for aging research because of three specific traits. First, the adult lifespans of the reproductives of many perennial social insects surpass by far those of most solitary insects. The queens of honey bees can live for several years, and the queens of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernadou, A., Busch, J., & Heinze, J. (2015). Diversity in identity: Behavioral flexibility, dominance, and age polyethism in a clonal ant. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 1365–1375.
  2. 2.
    Boomsma, J. J., Huszár, D. B., & Pedersen, J. S. (2014). The evolution of multiqueen breeding in eusocial lineages with permanent physically differentiated castes. Animal Behaviour, 92, 241–252.
  3. 3.
    Bourke, A. F. G. (2007). Kin selection and the evolutionary theory of aging. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 103–128.
  4. 4.
    de Verges, J., & Nehring, V. (2016). A critical look at proximate causes of social insect senescence: Damage accumulation or hyperfunction? Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 69–75.
  5. 5.
    Elsner, D., Meusemann, K., & Korb, J. (2018). Longevity and transposon defense, the case of termite reproductives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115, 5504–5509.
  6. 6.
    Finkel, T., & Holbrook, N. J. (2000). Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature, 408, 239–247.
  7. 7.
    Flatt, T., & Partridge, L. (2018). Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biology, 16, 93.
  8. 8.
    Flatt, T., Tu, M. P., & Tatar, M. (2005). Hormonal pleiotropy and the juvenile hormone regulation of Drosophila development and life history. BioEssays, 27, 999–1010.
  9. 9.
    Giehr, J., Heinze, J., & Schrempf, A. (2017). Group demography affects ant colony performance and individual speed of queen and worker aging. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17, 173.
  10. 10.
    Hartmann, A., & Heinze, J. (2003). Lay eggs, live longer: Division of labor and life span in a clonal ant species. Evolution, 57, 2424–2429.
  11. 11.
    Heinze, J. (2016). The male has done his work – The male may go. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 22–27.
  12. 12.
    Ingram, K. K., Pilko, A., Heer, J., & Gordon, D. M. (2013). Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 540–550.
  13. 13.
    Jemielity, S., Kimura, M., Parker, J. D., Cao, X., Aviv, A., & Keller, L. (2007). Short telomeres in short-lived males: What are the molecular and evolutionary causes? Aging Cell, 6, 225–233.
  14. 14.
    Keller, L., & Genoud, M. (1997). Extraordinary lifespans in ants: A test of evolutionary theories of ageing. Nature, 389, 958–960.
  15. 15.
    Korb, J. (2015). Juvenile hormone, a central regulator of termite caste polyphenism. In A. Zayed & C. F. Kent (Eds.), Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 48, pp. 131–161). Oxford, UK: Academic.
  16. 16.
    Kowald, A., & Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2016). Can aging be programmed? A critical literature review. Aging Cell, 15, 986–998.
  17. 17.
    Kramer, B. H., van Doorn, G. S., Weissing, F. J., & Pen, I. (2016). Lifespan divergence between social insect castes: Challenges and opportunities for evolutionary theories of aging. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 76–80.
  18. 18.
    Kramer, B. H., & Schaible, R. (2013). Colony size explains the lifespan differences between queens and workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109, 710–724.
  19. 19.
    Monroy Kuhn, J. M., & Korb, J. (2016). Editorial overview: Social insects: Aging and the re-shaping of the fecundity/longevity trade-off with sociality. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, vii–vix.
  20. 20.
    Münch, D., & Amdam, G. V. (2010). The curious case of aging plasticity in honey bee. FEBS Letters, 584, 2496–2503.
  21. 21.
    Oettler, J., & Schrempf, A. (2016). Fitness and aging in Cardiocondyla obscurior ant queens. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 58–63.
  22. 22.
    Rodrigues, M. A., & Flatt, T. (2016). Endocrine uncoupling of the trade-off between reproduction and somatic maintenance in eusocial insects. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 1–8.
  23. 23.
    Rueppell, O., Kaftanouglu, O., & Page, R. E. (2009) Honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers live longer in small than in large colonies. Experimental Gerontology, 44, 447–452.
  24. 24.
    Tsuji, K. (2006). Life history strategy and evolution of insect societies: Age structure, spatial distribution and density dependence. In V. E. Kipyatkov (Ed.), Life cycles in social insects: Behaviour, ecology and evolution (pp. 21–36). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LS Zoologie/EvolutionsbiologieUniversität RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Evolutionary Biology & EcologyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and Engineering, Theoretical Research in Evolutionary Life SciencesRUGGroningenNetherlands