365体育网站

365体育网站Advertisement

Sozialpolitik

  • Christian LammertEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag bietet eine problemorientierte Skizze der Sozialpolitik in den USA. Aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive werden dabei sowohl konzeptionelle als auch empirische Besonderheiten des US-amerikanischen Wohlfahrtsregimes diskutiert. Anhand der Bereiche Alterssicherung und Sozialhilfe werden die Kernmerkmale von US-Sozialpolitik herausgearbeitet, die sich insbesondere im Bereich der privaten Absicherung und der staatlichen Subventionierung von Sozialpolitik über das Steuersystem zeigen.

Schlüsselwörter

Sozialpolitik Wohlfahrtsstaat Social Security Sozialhilfe Gesundheitspolitik 

Literatur

  1. Albert, Vicky. 2000. Reducing welfare benefits: Consequences for adequacy of and eligibility for benefits. Social Work. Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 45(4): 300–310.
  2. Amenta, Edwin. 1998. Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern social policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  3. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2019. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). . Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
  4. Center on Budget und Policy Priorities. 2012. The earned income tax credit. Washington, DC: CBPP.
  5. Congressional Research Service. 2019. Social security primer. . Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
  6. Copeland, Craig. 2014. Employment-based retirement plan participation: Geographic differences and trends, 2013. Washington, DC: Employment Benefits Research Institute Issue Brief. . Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
  7. DeNavas, Carmen, Bernadette Proctor, und Cheryl Lee. 2018. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2017. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. . Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
  8. Eslami, Esa, Kai Filion, und Mark Strayer. 2011. Characteristics of supplemental nutrition assistance program households: Fiscal year 2010. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
  9. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Falk, Gene, Karen E. Lynch, und Jessica Tollestrup. 2018. Federal Spending on benefits and Services for People with Low Income: In Brief. Congressional Research Service. . Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
  11. Fraser, Nancy, und Linda Gordon. 1997. Abhängigkeit im Sozialstaat. Genealogie eines Schlüsselbegriffs. In Die halbierte Gerechtigkeit, Hrsg. Nancy Fraser, 180–220. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
  12. Garfinkel, Irwin, Lee Rainwater, und Timothy Smeeding. 2010. Wealth & welfare states. Is America a laggard or leader? Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Golshan, Tara. 2019. Trump said he wouldn’t cut Medicaid, social security, and medicare. His 2020 budget cuts all 3, Vox News, March 12. . Zugegriffen am 14.08.2019.
  14. Grell, Britta, und Christian Lammert. 2013. Sozialpolitik in den USA, Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  15. Howard, Christopher. 1997. The hidden welfare state. Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Leman, Christopher. 1977. Patterns of policy development: Social security in the United States and Canada. Public Policy 25:261–291.
  17. Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The submerged state. How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Munnell, Alicia, und Laura Quinby. 2009. Pension coverage and retirement security. Chestnut Hill: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
  19. Nichols, John. 2011. The Nation: Obama’s social security dilemma. NPR News. . Zugegriffen am 11.10.2013.
  20. OECD. 2010. Employment outlook 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  21. OECD. 2019. Social Expenditure Database. .
  22. Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  23. Peter, Waltraut. 2005. Der amerikanische earned income tax credit als Beispiel einer „make work pay“-Strategie. In I.W-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung. . Zugegriffen am 11.10.2013.
  24. Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  25. Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369–404.
  26. Titmuss, Richard M. 1976. Commitment to welfare. London: Harper Collins.
  27. US Department of Labor. 2018. Private pension plan bulletin. Washington, DC: Historical Tables and Graphs.
  28. US House of Representatives. 2012. 2011 Green Book. Chapter TANF. Tables and Figures. Washington, DC: U.S.
  29. Weaver, Kent R. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  30. Weir, Margaret, Ann Shola Orloff, und Theda Skocpol. 1988. Understanding American social policy. In The politics of social policy in the United States, Hrsg. Dies, 3–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  31. Wolch, Jennifer. 1990. The Shadow. State: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
  32. Wolfe, Alan. 1975. The limits of legitimacy: Political contradictions of contemporary capitalism. New York: Free Press.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JFKIFU BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations