365体育网站

Advertisement

Amerikanische Öffentlichkeit und ihre Infrastrukturen

  • Christoph RaetzschEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff der Öffentlichkeit ist zentral für die Analyse der modernen, amerikanischen Gesellschaft. An ihm kristallisieren sich exemplarisch gesellschaftliche Aushandlungsprozesse über demokratische Teilhabe, politische Willensbildung und die technologischen Grundlagen von öffentlicher Kommunikation. Dieser Beitrag behandelt die Medien und Infrastrukturen dieser Öffentlichkeit in den USA seit dem 19. Jahrhundert in Bezug auf Journalismus und soziale Medien der Gegenwart. Im ersten Teil wird die Anfangsphase der Massenpresse als eine grundlegende Konstellation der journalistischen Öffentlichkeit erläutert, die mit dem Aufkommen des Internet und der sozialen Medien seit Beginn der 2000er-Jahre in eine fundamentale Krise geraten ist. Im zweiten Teil wird dann der problematische Charakter von sozialen Medien diskutiert, die sich als neutrale Plattformen für die Vermittlung von Kommunikation zwischen einzelnen Nutzer_innen sehen, jedoch gleichzeitig eine algorithmen- und datenbasierte Infrastruktur der digitalen Öffentlichkeit schaffen, in der Journalismus nur noch ein Akteur unter Vielen ist.

Schlüsselwörter

Digitale Öffentlichkeit Soziale Netzwerke Journalismus Infrastruktur Digitale Medien 

Literatur

  1. Adams, Henry. 1999. The education of Henry Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Anderson, Benedict R. [1983] 2006. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Überarb. Aufl. London: Verso.
  3. Anderson, Chris W., Emily Bell, und Clay Shirky. 2012. Post-industrial journalism: Adapting to the present. New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism.
  4. Auxier, Brooke E., und Jessica Vitak. 2019. Factors motivating customization and echo chamber creation within digital news environments. Social Media + Society 5(2): 1–13.
  5. Balestrini, Mara. 2017. A city in common. Explorations on sustained community engagement with bottom-up civic technologies. London: Intel ICRI Cities/University College London.
  6. Barbrook, Richard, und Andy Cameron. 1996. The Californian ideology. . Zugegriffen am 11.11.2019.
  7. Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris, und Hal Roberts. 2018. Network propaganda: manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Bird, Elizabeth. 2003. The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. New York: Routledge.
  9. Blondheim, Menahem. 1994. News over the wires. The telegraph and the flow of public information in America, 1844–1897. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Blondheim, Menahem, und Tamar Liebes. 2009. Television news and the nation: The end. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 625(1): 182–195.
  11. boyd, danah m. 2011. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites, Hrsg. Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
  12. Carey, James W. 1989. Communication as culture. Essays on media and society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
  13. Carlson, Oliver. 1942. The man who made news. James Gordon Bennett. New York: Duell, Sloane and Pearce.
  14. Deuze, Mark, und Tamara Witschge. 2018. Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism 19(2): 165–181.  .
  15. Dewey, John. 1927. The public and its problems. New York: H. Holt and Company.
  16. Dijck, José van, Thomas Poell, und Martijn de Waal. 2018. The platform society. Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Easterling, Keller. 2016. Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. New York: Verso.
  18. Faÿ, Bernard. 1927. Notes on the American Press at the end of the eighteenth century. New York: The Grolier Club.
  19. Fraser, Nancy. 2007. Special section: Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society 24(4): 7–30.
  20. Gans, Herbert J. 2003. Democracy and the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Gillespie, Tarleton. 2017. Is „platform“ the right metaphor for the technology companies that dominate digital media? Nieman Lab. . Zugegriffen am 11.11.2019.
  22. Goodman, Matthew. 2008. The sun and the moon. The remarkable true account of hoaxers, showmen, dueling journalists, and lunar man-bats in nineteenth-century New York. New York: Basic Books.
  23. Gordon, Eric, und Paul Mihailidis, Hrsg. 2016. Civic media: Technology, design, practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen Zu einer Kategorie der Bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Mit einem Vorwort zur Neuauflage 1990. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
  25. Helmond, Anne, David B. Nieborg, und Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2019. Facebook’s evolution: development of a platform-as-infrastructure. Internet Histories 3(2): 123–146.
  26. Innis, Harold A. 1949. The bias of communication. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 15(4): 457–476.
  27. John, Richard R. 1998. Spreading the news. The American postal system from franklin to morse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  28. John, Richard. 2010. Network nation: Inventing American telecommunications. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  29. Klinenberg, Eric. 2018. Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. New York: Crown.
  30. Klinger, Ulrike. 2018. Aufstieg der Semiöffentlichkeit: Eine relationale Perspektive. Publizistik 63(2): 245–267.
  31. Kreide, Regina. 2016. Digital spaces, public places and communicative power: In defense of deliberative democracy. Philosophy & Social Criticism 42(4–5): 476–486.
  32. Leonard, Thomas C. 1995. News for all: Americaʼs coming-of-age with the press. New York: Oxford University Press.
  33. Lippmann, Walter. 1997. Public opinion. New York: Free Press.
  34. Mahony, Nick, und Hilde C. Stephansen. 2016. The frontiers of participatory public engagement. European Journal of Cultural Studies 19(6): 583–597.
  35. Marwick, Alice E., und danah m. boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
  36. Milan, Stefania. 2013. Social movements and their technologies. Wiring social change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Park, Robert E. 1923. The natural history of the newspaper. The American Journal of Sociology 29(3): 273–289.
  38. Pasley, Jeffrey L. 2001. ‚The tyranny of printers‘. Newspaper politics in the early American republic. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  39. Peters, Chris, und Tamara Witschge. 2014. From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. Journalism Practice 9(1): 19–34.
  40. Raetzsch, Christoph. 2015. Innovation through practice. Journalism as a structure of public communication. Journalism Practice 9(1): 65–77.  .
  41. Sabl, Andrew. 2002. Community organizing as Tocquevillean politics: The art, practices, and ethos of association. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 1–19.
  42. Schudson, Michael. 1978. Discovering the news. A social history of american newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
  43. Schudson, Michael. 1992. Was there ever a public sphere? If so, when? Reflections on the American case. In Habermas and the public sphere, Hrsg. Craig J. Calhoun, 143–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  44. Schudson, Michael. 1994. The public sphere and its problems: Bringing the state (back) in. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 8:529–546.
  45. Schudson, Michael. 1997. Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 14(4): 297–309.  .
  46. Schudson, Michael. 1998. The good citizen. A history of American civil life. New York: Free Press.
  47. Schudson, Michael. 2011. Tocqueville’s interesting error. On journalism and democracy. In The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media, Hrsg. Robert J. Schapiro und Lawrence R. Jacobs, 61–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Schudson, Michael. 2013. Fourteen or fifteen generations: News as a cultural form and journalism as a historical formation. American Journalism 30(1): 29–35.  .
  49. Schudson, Michael. 2018. Why journalism still matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  50. Schudson, Michael, und Leonard Downie Jr. 2009. The reconstruction of American journalism. Columbia Journalism Review. . Zugegriffen am 11.11.2019.
  51. Seaver, Nick. 2018. Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture.  .
  52. Siles, Ignacio, und Pablo J. Boczkowski. 2012. Making sense of the newspaper crisis: A critical assessment of existing research and an agenda for future work. New Media & Society 14(8): 1375–1394.
  53. Smith, Jeffery A. 1988. Printers and press freedom. The ideology of early American journalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  54. Standage, Tom. 2007. The victorian internet. The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s on-line pioneers. New York: Walker & Company.
  55. Starr, Paul. 2004. The creation of the media. Political origins of modern communications. New York: Basic Books.
  56. Streeter, Thomas. 2017. The Internet as a structure of feeling: 1992–1996. Internet Histories 1(1–2): 79–89.
  57. Swart, Joëlle, Chris Peters, und Marcel Broersma. 2018. Shedding light on the dark social: The connective role of news and journalism in social media communities. New Media & Society 20(11): 4329–4345.
  58. Syvertsen, Trine. 2017. Media resistance. Protest, dislike, abstention. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  59. Syvertsen, Trine, und Gunn Enli. 2019. Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence.  .
  60. Tandoc, Edson C., Zheng Wei Lim, und Richard Ling. 2017. Defining „fake news“: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism 6(2): 137–153.
  61. Taylor, Charles. 2002. Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture 14(1): 91–124.
  62. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2002. Democracy in America. New York: Bantam.
  63. Varnelis, Kazys, Hrsg. 2008. Networked publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  64. Vitak, Jessica. 2012. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4): 451–470.
  65. Vormann, Boris. 2015. Global port cities in North America. Urbanization processes and global production networks. New York: Routldege.
  66. Warner, Michael. 1990. The letters of the republic. Publication and the public sphere in eighteenth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  67. Weintraub, Jeff. 1997. The theory and practice of the public/private distinction. In Public and private in thought and practice. Perspectives on a grand dichotomy, Hrsg. Jeff Weintraub und Krishan Kumar, 1–42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  68. Willems, Wendy. 2019. ‚The politics of things‘: Digital media, urban space, and the materiality of publics. Media, Culture & Society 41(8): 1192–1209.  .
  69. Woodstock, Louise. 2014. The news-democracy narrative and the unexpected benefits of limited news consumption: The case of news resisters. Journalism 15(7): 834–849.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media and Journalism StudiesAarhus UniversitetAarhusDänemark

Personalised recommendations