365体育网站

Advertisement

Der Kongress in den USA: Repräsentation, Machtkontrolle und Gestaltungswille

  • Thomas ZittelEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 113 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

365体育网站Der US-amerikanische Kongress gilt im internationalen Vergleich als ein besonderes Parlament. Aus funktionaler Sicht ist er ein Musterbeispiel für Effektivität in der Gesetzgebung, in der Exekutivkontrolle, und in der Repräsentation der Wähler. Auf der strukturellen Ebene gilt der Kongress als Prototyp einer individualisierten Vertretungskörperschaft mit vergleichsweise schwach ausgeprägten Parteistrukturen. Dieser Beitrag zeigt in einem ersten Teil, wie sich diese funktionalen und strukturellen Besonderheiten der US-amerikanischen Legislativen auf der Handlungsebene niederschlagen bzw. welche typischen Handlungsstrategien der Kongressmitglieder damit jeweils verbunden sind. In einem zweiten Teil thematisiert der vorliegende Beitrag wichtige Unterschiede und Veränderungen im Zeitverlauf. Ein dritter und abschließender Teil diskutiert die Gründe für die skizzierten Unterschiede im Quer- und Längsschnitt.

Schlüsselwӧrter

Amerikanischer Kongress Abgeordnete Politisches Handeln Politische Parteien 

Literatur

  1. Aberbach, Joel D. 1991. Keeping a Watchful Eye. The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  2. Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center. Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. Yale: Yale University Press.
  3. Bagehot, Walter. 1990 [1867]. The House of Commons. In Legislatures, Hrsg. Philip Norton, 36–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., und Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  6. Bishin, Benjamin G. 2000. Constituency ifluence in congress: Do subconstituencies matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 389–415.
  7. Brady, David W., Joseph Cooper, und Patricia A. Hurley. 1979. The decline of party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(3): 381–407.
  8. Brady, David H., und Hahrie Hahn. 2004. An extended historical view of congressional party polarization. Working Paper prepared for presentation at Princeton University, Dec. 2. Stanford, CA.
  9. Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, und Morris P. Fiorina. 1984. The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament. The American Political Science Review 78(1): 110–125.
  10. Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, und Morris P. Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote. Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
  11. Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. Representation in congress: Constituents and roll calls in the 106th house. Journal of Politics 68: 397–409.
  12. Collie, Melissa P. 1988. Universalism and the parties in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1921–1980. American Journal of Political Science 32(4): 865–83.
  13. Cooper, Joseph, und David W. Brady. 1981. Institutional context and leadership style. American Political Science Review 75: 411–425.
  14. Crespin, Michael H., und Charles J. Finnochiaro. 2013. Elections and the politics of pork in the US Senate. Social Science Quartely 94(2): 506–529.
  15. Davidson, Roger H., und Walter J. Oleszek. 1996. Congress and Its Members, 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  16. Davidson, Roger H. 1988. Der Kongreß als Repräsentative Institution. In US-Kongress und Deutscher Bundestag, Hrsg. Uwe Thaysen, Roger H. Davidson und Robert G. Livingston, 49–72. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  17. Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, und Frances E. Lee. 2008. Congress and Its Members, 11th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
  18. Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, Frances E. Lee, und Eric Schickler. 2013. Congress and Its Members, 14. Aufl. Los Angeles, CA: Sage und CQ Press.
  19. Depauw, Sam. 1999. Parliamentary party cohesion and the scarcity of sanctions in the Belgian Chamber of Representatives (1991–1995). Res Publica 41: 15–39.
  20. Diermeier, D., und T.J. Feddersen. 1998. Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–621.
  21. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
  22. Esaiasson, Peter, and Soeren Holmberg. 1996. Representation from Above. Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
  23. Evans, C.L., und Walter J. Oleszek. 1997. Congress Under Fire. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  24. Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown.
  25. Fenno, Richard. 1978. Homestyle. House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
  26. Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. The case of the vanishing margins: The bureaucracy did it. The American Political Science Review 71(1): 177–181.
  27. Fiorina, Morris P. 2011. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. Boston: Longman Publishers.
  28. Fisher, Louis. 2007. Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the President, 5th ed. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  29. Fleisher, Richard, und Jon Bond. 2004. The shrinking middle in the US congress. British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 429–451.
  30. Friedman, Sally. 2007. Dilemmas of Representation: Local Politics, National Factors, and the Home Styles of Modern U.S. Congress Members. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  31. Gellner, Winand, und Martin Kleiber. 2012. Das Regierungssystem der USA, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  32. Hetherington, Mark J. 2009. Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 413-448.
  33. Huber, John. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 8th ed. New York, NY: Longman.
  35. Jewell, Malcom E., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1973. The Legislative Process in the United States. New York, NY: Random House.
  36. Jones, David R., und Monika L. McDermott. 2010. Americans, Congress, and Democratic Responsiveness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  37. Katz, Richard S. 2007. Political Institutions in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
  39. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  40. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  41. Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology. Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
  42. Loomis, Burdett A. 2011. The US Senate: From Deliberation to Dysfunction. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  43. Lowell, A.L. 1901. The influence of party upon legislation in England and America. Annual Report of the American Historical Association for 1901 1: 319–542.
  44. Mann, Thomas E. 2010. Congress. In Developments in American Politics 6, Hrsg. Gillian Peele, Christopher J. Bailey, Bruce E. Cain und B. Guy Peters, 117–131. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT und London: Yale University Press.
  46. Miller, Edward E., und Donald Stokes. 1963. Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.
  47. Ornstein, Norman J., Thomas E. Mann, Michael J. Malbin, und Andrew Rugg. 2013. Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington, D.C.: .
  48. Polsby, Nelson. 1984. Political Innovation in America. The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven, CT und London: Yale University Press.
  49. Polsby, Nelson. 1975. Legislatures. In Handbook of Political Science, Hrsg. Fred I. Greenstein und Nelson W. Polsby, 277–296. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  50. Rohde, D.W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
  51. Roper, John. 2010. The presidency. In Developments in American Politics 6, Hrsg. Gillian Peele, Christopher J. Bailey, Bruce E. Cain und B. Guy Peters, 102–116. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  52. Shaw, Malcom. 1979. Conclusion. In Committees in Legislatures, Hrsg. John D. Lees und Malcom Shaw. Durham: Duke University Press.
  53. Shepsle, Kenneth A., und Barry R. Weingast. 1994. Positive theories of congressional institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(2): 149–179.
  54. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. Party unity in parliamentary democracies. A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies 12: 150–178.
  55. Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Verlag.
  56. Smith, Steven S. 1989. Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  57. Smith, Steven S., und Gerald Gramm. 2013. The dynamics of party government in congress. In Congress Reconsidered, Hrsg. Lawrence C Dodd und Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Los Angeles, CA: Sage und CQ Press.
  58. Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings.
  59. Taylor, Andrew J. 2012. Voting on the floor: Members’ most fundamental right. In New Directions in Congressional Politics, Hrsg. Jamie L. Carson. New York, London: Routledge.
  60. Theriault, Sean M. 2006. Party polarization in the US congress. Party Politics 12(4): 483–503.
  61. Thurber, James A. 2013. The dynamics and dysfunction of the congressional budget process: From inception to deadlock. In Congress Reconsidered, Hrsg. Lawrence C. Dodd und Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 319–345. Los Angeles, CA: Sage und CQ Press.
  62. Uslaner, Eric M. 1996. The Decline of Comity in Congress: Representatives and Ideologues in the Senate. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  63. Uslaner, Eric M. 1999. The Movers and the Shirkers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  64. Uslaner, Eric M., und Thomas Zittel. 2006. Comparative legislative behavior. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Hrsg. Rod A.W. Rhodes, Sarah Binder und Bert Rockman, 455–473. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  65. Volden, Craig, und Alan E. Wiseman. 2013. Legislative effectiveness and representation. In Congress Reconsidered, Hrsg. Lawrence C. Dodd und Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 237–265. Los Angeles, CA: Sage und CQ Press.
  66. Ware, Alan. 2010. Political parties and the new partisanship. In: Developments in American Politics 6, Hrsg. Gillian Peele, Christopher J. Bailey, Bruce E. Cain und B. Guy Peters, 50–66. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  67. White, W.S. 1956. The Citadel. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
  68. Zingher, Joshua N. 2014. An analysis of the changing social bases of America’s political parties: 1952–2008. Electoral studies. Online first at
  69. Zittel, Thomas. 2010. Mehr Responsivität durch neue digitale Medien? Die elektronische Wählerkommunikation von Abgeordneten in Deutschland, Schweden und den USA. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe-UniversitätFrankfurtDeutschland

Personalised recommendations